Skip to main content
· 4/13/1982

State in Interest of Pigott

Citations

  • 413 So. 2d 659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “no reason why the rationale and justification used in Byrd should not apply to juvenile cases on appeal”
  • finding “no reason why the rationale and justification used in Byrd should not apply to juvenile cases on appeal”
  • finding \no reason why the rationale and justification used in Byrd should not apply to juvenile cases on appeal\
  • wherein the appellate court held that “in the trial of a juvenile, the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure controls as concerns responsive verdicts” and found “no reason why the rationale and justification used in Byrd should not apply to juvenile cases on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lear, Carter and Chiasson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.