State Highway Department v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Highway Department was entitled to the same charge requested by the appellants in the present case, where it sought to mitigate the extent of the condemnee’s consequential damages by demonstrating the availability of a private way easement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).