State Highway Commission v. Stupek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the appellate court found that based upon the facts of the case, the trial court’s ruling that certain personal property was not a newly discovered asset was not erroneous
• the appellate court found that based upon the facts of the case, the trial court’s ruling that certain personal property was not a newly discovered asset was not erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).