Oregon Supreme Court· 4/11/1956
State Highway Commission v. Efem Warehouse Co.
Citations
- 295 P.2d 1101
- 207 Or. 237
- 70 A.L.R. 2d 797
- 1956 Ore. LEXIS 312
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying this court’s common-law understanding of tender in deciding whether plaintiff Highway Commission had made “tender” that precluded award of attorney fees under former ORS 366.380(7) (1955), repealed by Oregon Laws 1971, chapter 741, section 38
- highway commission, a quasi-public corporation, is “vested with broad powers but, of course, possesses no authority other than that conferred upon it by statute”
- in condemnation process under ORS 366.380(7) (1955), an offer of payment conditioned upon the landowner’s giving a warranty deed was a legally sufficient preclusive “tender” because the state was legally entitled to insist on that condition
- validity of tender determined in light of governing statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warner, Tooze, Lusk, Brand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fresk v. KraemerOregon Supreme Court· 2004-10-21· cited 45×
- State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court· 1957-12-31· cited 40×
- State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court· 1961-07-19· cited 40×
- Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court· 1959-02-25· cited 37×
- Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-12-16· cited 18×
- Stelljes v. State Bd. of ParoleOregon Supreme Court· 1989-02-14· cited 11×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Approximately 3.4 Acres of Land Located at Parcels No. 4-2 & 4-3 Estate EnsomhedVirgin Islands· 1975-12-29· cited 5×
- Malan v. TiptonOregon Supreme Court· 2011-02-17· cited 4×
- State Highway Commission v. LytleOregon Supreme Court· 1963-04-17· cited 4×
- State Highway Commission v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-12-15· cited 3×
- Fresk v. KraemerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-01-08· cited 3×
- Davis v. NYE DITCH USERS IMP. DIST.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-14· cited 1×
- Davis v. Nye Ditch Users Improvement DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-14· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.