· 1/5/1967
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Sewell
Citations
- 153 S.E.2d 432
- 223 Ga. 31
- 1967 Ga. LEXIS 400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- with respect to a provision covering “entire and irrecoverable loss of sight”, district court erred in instructing that the provision covered the loss of sight for all practical purposes; term “entire” was unambiguous and meant the loss of all sight
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duckworth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.