Skip to main content
· 1/5/1967

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Sewell

Citations

  • 153 S.E.2d 432
  • 223 Ga. 31
  • 1967 Ga. LEXIS 400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • with respect to a provision covering “entire and irrecoverable loss of sight”, district court erred in instructing that the provision covered the loss of sight for all practical purposes; term “entire” was unambiguous and meant the loss of all sight

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duckworth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.