Skip to main content
· 7/2/1979

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Price

Citations

  • 396 N.E.2d 134
  • 181 Ind. App. 258
  • 1979 Ind. App. LEXIS 1365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • insurer was “entitled to rely” on facts given in insurance application and “had no duty to investigate the truthfulness of the application”
  • although “insurance company has no right to rescind a policy where it had knowledge of the facts or where it has sufficient information which would cause a reasonably prudent man to inquire further, ... State Farm had no notice that the information obtained from [the insured] was false”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrard, Hoffman, Staton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.