Skip to main content
· 3/2/1990

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Major

Citations

  • 389 S.E.2d 307
  • 239 Va. 375
  • 6 Va. Law Rep. 1588
  • 1990 Va. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the deletion of a word during recodification plainly indicated the legislature’s intent to alter the substantive meaning of the code provision
  • finding a “plainly indicate[d]” legislative intent “to alter the substantive meaning of the recodified provision” of the insurance law from “the change in language in the recodified provision,” notwithstanding the absence of a “revisors’ note” designating the revision as substantive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whiting

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.