State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Licensed Beverage Insurance Exchange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding reimbursement statute ensures that PIP costs “ ‘will be borne by ... the individuals responsible for the injury who, in good conscience, ought to pay them’ ” (quoting Aetna Ins. Co. v. Gilchrist Bros., Inc., 85 N.J. 550, 568 n. 2, 428 A.2d 1254 (1981
• holding reimbursement statute ensures that PIP costs “ ‘will be borne by ... the individuals responsible for the injury who, in good conscience, ought to pay them’ ” (quoting Aetna Ins. Co. v. Gilchrist Bros., Inc., 85 N.J. 550, 568 n. 2, 428 A.2d 1254 (1981) (Sullivan, J., dissenting))
• “The reimbursement right conferred by section 9.1 encompasses all tortfeasors that are not subject to the No-Fault Law.”
• “As expressed by then-Governor Kean, the purpose of the 1984 Act was to ‘bring about long sought after reductions in premiums for New Jersey motorists.’ ” (quoting Statement of Governor Thomas H. Kean accompanying L. 1983, c. 362)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).