State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Karasek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in which Division One held that a policy provision reducing an employee’s uninsured motorist coverage by the amount of workers’ compensation benefits received was void
• “[W]e start from the premise that if we are governed by the clear and unambiguous terms of the policy [the insured] cannot recover”
• policy provision reducing amounts payable under underinsured motorist coverage violated public policy of State where employee himself paid the premiums
• finding workers’ compensation offset invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).