State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Herrin Transportation Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal preemption does not apply to claims that “do not sound in failure to warn, arose after the passage of the 2007 Act, or involve a generic manufacturer’s failure to conform its label to that of the name brand”
• noting the importance of distinguishing between cases that \were amended in light\ of Supreme Court precedent and those that were not
• in light of footnote 1 in Mensing, “we decline to find post-Act claims pre-empted”
• in light of footnote 1 in Mensing, \we decline to find post-Act claims pre-empted\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).