State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Duel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that res judicata \is no defense where between the time of the first judgment and the second there has been a change in the law creating an altered situation\
• observing that “res judicata is no defense where between the time of the first judgment and the second there has been an intervening decision or a change in the law creating an altered situation”
• observing that “res judicata is no defense where between the time of the first judgment and the second there has been an intervening decision or a change in the law creating an altered situation.”
• concluding that Federated overruled State Farm
• estoppel does not apply when change in law has intervened between time of first judgment and second action
• “[RJes judicata is no defense where between the time of the first judgment and the second there has been- an intervening decision or change in the law creating an altered situation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).