State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DeHaan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that where the Policy’s “language is identical to the statutory text, it is reasonable to infer that [the insurer] intended to give it the same meaning given to the statute”
• “Shooting people is likewise not the manner in which vehicles are normally used, or for which they are designed, i.e., vehicles are not normally necessary for shooting people.”
• “A term which is clear in one context may be ambiguous in 2 “J.A.” refers to the joint appendix filed by the parties in this appeal. 3 another.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).