State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Berg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff had no claim for emotional distress damages where insurer’s refusal to pay PIP benefits made her unable to pay necessary medical expenses, leading to harassment by service providers
• affirming the dismissal of Berg’s emotional distress claim because an alleged “difference of opinion as to the meaning and application of the terms of a contract could rarely, if ever, amount to outrageous conduct,” not because the dispute dealt with insurance coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).