· 9/13/2001
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Secrist
Citations
- 33 P.3d 1272
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4609
- 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 1513
- 2001 WL 1045594
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that driver violated cooperation clause of insurance policy where he discharged insurer’s lawyers, and admitted liability for defendant’s injuries
- explaining that an insurer has been materially and substantially disadvantaged where the insured has acted in a way that has an “adverse effect on the insurer’s defense, settlement, or other handling of the claim”
- explaining that an insurer has been materially and substantially disadvantaged where the insured has acted in a way that has an “adverse effect on the insurer’s defense, settlement, or other handling of the claim”
- explaining that an insurer has been materially and substantially disadvantaged where the insured has acted in a way that has an “adverse effect on the insurer’s defense, settlement, or other handling of the claim”
- affirming summary judgment in insurer’s favor where insured failed to respond to insurer’s letters advising him of his duty to cooperate
- affirming summary judgment in insurer’s favor where insured failed to respond to insurer’s letters advising him of his duty to cooperate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sternberg, Ruland, Rothenberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.