Skip to main content
· 9/13/2001

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Secrist

Citations

  • 33 P.3d 1272
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4609
  • 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 1513
  • 2001 WL 1045594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that driver violated cooperation clause of insurance policy where he discharged insurer’s lawyers, and admitted liability for defendant’s injuries
  • explaining that an insurer has been materially and substantially disadvantaged where the insured has acted in a way that has an “adverse effect on the insurer’s defense, settlement, or other handling of the claim”
  • explaining that an insurer has been materially and substantially disadvantaged where the insured has acted in a way that has an “adverse effect on the insurer’s defense, settlement, or other handling of the claim”
  • explaining that an insurer has been materially and substantially disadvantaged where the insured has acted in a way that has an “adverse effect on the insurer’s defense, settlement, or other handling of the claim”
  • affirming summary judgment in insurer’s favor where insured failed to respond to insurer’s letters advising him of his duty to cooperate
  • affirming summary judgment in insurer’s favor where insured failed to respond to insurer’s letters advising him of his duty to cooperate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sternberg, Ruland, Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.