· 8/25/2011
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Menendez
Citations
- 70 So. 3d 566
- 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 469
- 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1969
- 2011 WL 3715044
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that a contract is ambiguous if it is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation and those interpretations cannot be fairly reconciled
- confirming de novo standard of review for construing an insurance contract
- “In interpreting an insurance contract, we are bound by the plain meaning of the contract’s text.”
- “In interpreting an insurance contract, we are bound by the plain meaning of the contract’s text.”
- “In interpreting an insurance contract, we are bound by the plain meaning of the contract’s text.”
- “In interpreting an insurance contract, we are bound by the plain meaning of the contract’s text.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canady, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Polston, Labarga, Perry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.