Skip to main content
· 8/25/2011

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Menendez

Citations

  • 70 So. 3d 566
  • 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 469
  • 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1969
  • 2011 WL 3715044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a contract is ambiguous if it is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation and those interpretations cannot be fairly reconciled
  • confirming de novo standard of review for construing an insurance contract
  • “In interpreting an insurance contract, we are bound by the plain meaning of the contract’s text.”
  • “In interpreting an insurance contract, we are bound by the plain meaning of the contract’s text.”
  • “In interpreting an insurance contract, we are bound by the plain meaning of the contract’s text.”
  • “In interpreting an insurance contract, we are bound by the plain meaning of the contract’s text.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Polston, Labarga, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.