State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. Powers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insurers may designate their UM coverage as excess relative to other insurers and that such a holding did not contravene the proposition that UM coverage is “designed to protect persons, not vehicles”
• explaining that when multiple insurers both provide primary coverage, the coverage should “be apportioned among the insurers on a pro rata basis”
• “Unless prohibited by statute or public policy, an insurer’s liability is controlled by its policy provisions.... ”
• noting this Court will not address issues inadequately briefed
• Court will not decide issues inadequately briefed
• stacked UIM insurers may establish priority of coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).