STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, because the oil seal that permitted oil to leak and start a fire that destroyed the automobile was “an integral component part of [the] car[,]” the car could not be considered “other property” that would render the economic loss doctrine inapplicable
• “Contract law and the law of warranty are well suited to handle controversies in which commercial purchases do not live up to expectations of the consumer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).