State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Yanes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that UM coverage did not exist because claimant had finished exiting the vehicle and had started new act of walking across the street
• finding an employee was not entitled to UM coverage under a business automobile policy because he was not “occupying” the employer’s vehicle at the time of the accident as required by the policy’s UM provisions
• van operator who had parked his van, unloaded a package, and was crossing the street at the time he was struck by an uninsured motor vehicle had ceased the activity of \alighting from\ the van, and had commenced the new activity of walking across the street
• van operator who had parked his van, unloaded a package, and was crossing the street at the time he was struck by an uninsured motor vehicle had ceased the activity of “alighting from” the van, and had commenced the new activity of walking across the street

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).