State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Murriel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s conclusion that where the Mississippi court would be forced to apply not only Mississippi law, but also California, Alabama and Georgia law, the confusion to the jury and the burden on the court are insurmountable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Albert v. Allied Glove Corp.
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 16×
• 3M Co. v. Johnson
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2006-04-13· cited 3×
• Karl Albert v. Allied Glove Corporation
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2005-04-21
• 3M Company v. Simeon Johnson
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2004-03-24
• Billy G. Alexander v. Allied Glove Corporation
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2005-04-21
• Alexander v. AC AND S, INC.
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2007-01-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. v. Armond
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2004-02-19· cited 87×
• Illinois Central RR Co. v. Travis
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2002-02-28· cited 45×
• METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Aetna Cas. & Sur.
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1999-01-14· cited 16×