Skip to main content
· 8/22/1994

State Farm Insurance Companies v. Ridenour

Citations

  • 646 A.2d 1188
  • 435 Pa. Super. 463
  • 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employee’s claim for underinsured motorist benefits against employer’s insurance company was not barred by exclusivity provision of Workers’ Compensation Act
  • insured was not precluded from recovering UIM benefits under her own policy to the extent that her injuries exceeded the limits of her employer’s UIM coverage
  • UIM arbitration could proceed, even though civil trial in accident case was not concluded, where arbitrators gave insurer a “credit” for the full amount of the tort-feasor’s liability insurance coverage
  • exhaustion of underlying underinsured coverage limits required before excess underinsured coverage can be awarded
  • exhaustion clause in policy that barred UIM coverage where insured settled claims with liability insurer for less than coverage limits, invalidated, and UIM carrier was entitled to credit for tort-feasor’s liability coverage payout
  • employee not required to exhaust limits of tort-feasor’s liability insurance coverage before seeking UIM benefits through arbitration, and, as in Krakower, arbitration panel was not required to postpone hearing pending resolution of tort action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Sole, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.