· 8/22/1994
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Ridenour
Citations
- 646 A.2d 1188
- 435 Pa. Super. 463
- 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2589
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- employee’s claim for underinsured motorist benefits against employer’s insurance company was not barred by exclusivity provision of Workers’ Compensation Act
- insured was not precluded from recovering UIM benefits under her own policy to the extent that her injuries exceeded the limits of her employer’s UIM coverage
- UIM arbitration could proceed, even though civil trial in accident case was not concluded, where arbitrators gave insurer a “credit” for the full amount of the tort-feasor’s liability insurance coverage
- exhaustion of underlying underinsured coverage limits required before excess underinsured coverage can be awarded
- exhaustion clause in policy that barred UIM coverage where insured settled claims with liability insurer for less than coverage limits, invalidated, and UIM carrier was entitled to credit for tort-feasor’s liability coverage payout
- employee not required to exhaust limits of tort-feasor’s liability insurance coverage before seeking UIM benefits through arbitration, and, as in Krakower, arbitration panel was not required to postpone hearing pending resolution of tort action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, Sole, Elliott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.