State Farm General Insurance v. JT's Frames, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the “rule of the last antecedent” to determine the scope of a policy provision
• finding “making known” meant disclosure of private content to another party
• “[A]n abstract ambiguity based on a semantically permissible interpretation of a word or phrase cannot create coverage where none would otherwise exist.”
• “The provision at issue falls in the middle of four definitions of ‘advertising injury’.... Viewed in this context, [the definition] may most reasonably be interpreted as referring to advertising material whose content violates a person’s right of privacy.”
• “The provision at issue falls in the middle of four definitions of ‘advertising injury’ . . . . Viewed in this context, [the definition] may most reasonably be interpreted as referring to advertising material whose content violates a person’s right of privacy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).