State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that utility tariffs limitations period did not abrogate general state law
• holding that utility tariff's limitations period did not abrogate general state law
• holding tariff limiting a general claim for failure to provide telephone service does not preclude a state claim arising out of the utility’s alleged negligence
• holding that utility tariff’s limitations period did not abrogate general state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).