Skip to main content
· 7/7/1992

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Miller Electric Co.

Citations

  • 596 N.E.2d 169
  • 231 Ill. App. 3d 355
  • 172 Ill. Dec. 890
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fee-shifting provisions were enacted to vindicate the rights of a consumer injured by the defendant and intended to encourage consumers to pursue their legal remedies by providing them with legal assistance
  • fee-shifting provisions were enacted to vindicate the rights of a consumer injured by the defendant and intended to encourage consumers to pursue their legal remedies by providing them with legal assistance
  • there is no common-law principle allowing attorney's fees either as costs or damages
  • there is no common-law principle allowing attorney fees either as costs or damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.