State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Falley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “public aims are not served by an overly restrictive construction of the intentional act exclusion or by adopting a test which depends on the after-the-fact testimony of the insured about his ‘subjective intent’”
• a deed and two unprobated wills could not be construed together because it was \mixing apples and oranges.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).