State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Drasin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “business pursuit” need not be insured’s sole or primary occupation
• rejecting argument that insured's activities were not excluded because they were not done in his capacity as an attorney; collecting cases
• rejecting argument that insured's activities were not excluded because they were not done in his capacity as an attorney; collecting cases
• affirming summary judgment in favor of insurer where underlying malicious prosecution action was still “pending,” because malicious prosecution requires a wilful act
• considering the length of time the insured was engaged in a partnership
• the insureds’ limited partnership in mining leases was a business pursuit even though one of the partners was an attorney by profession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).