State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Breazell Ex Rel. Estate of Plunkett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a foster child who had lived with his foster parents for twenty months and had no set date for departure was a resident of his foster parents' household under their homeowner's policy
• holding that two-year-old foster child was in the “exclusive care” of the insureds
• holding that a foster child who had lived with the named insured for twenty months, who was placed for an indefinite period of time, and who was treated as part of the family was a resident insured
• affirming the lower court's decision that an insurance company did not have a duty to defend or indemnify because the household exclusion applied
• considering terms of insurance contract, terms of foster care contract, nature of foster care relationship where foster parents treated child as their own son, and length of anticipated stay
• considering terms of insurance contract, terms of foster care contract, nature of foster care relationship where foster parents treated child as their own son, and length of anticipated stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).