State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Higgins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Ingalls’s statements to various physicians were admissible as admissions of a party under section 90,803(18)(a). It was not necessary to also qualify the statements under section 90.803(4), as statements for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment.”
• “When an amended complaint supersedes an earlier one, the allegations of the amended complaint control the duty to defend.”
• “When an amended complaint supersedes an earlier one, the allegations of the amended complaint control the duty to defend”
• “A heavy burden rests on appellants who seek to overturn such a ruling [granting a new trial], and any abuse of discretion must be patent from the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).