State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Castillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that policy terms “should be given their plain and ambiguous meaning as understood by the ‘man-on- the-street.’”
• explaining that “it is the policy’s terms which define [insurance] coverage, not the insured’s reasonable expectations”
• explaining that “it is the policy’s terms which define [insurance] coverage, not the insured’s reasonable expectations”
• explaining that “it is the policy’s terms which define coverage, not the insured’s reasonable expectations”
• observing that plaintiff's \home sustained extensive cracking damage ... caused by earth movement below the structure of the house from nearby blasting\
• noting that the trial court “entered final judgment in [the insureds’] favor, minus the policy’s $500 deductible plus prejudgment interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).