Skip to main content
· 10/28/2009

State Farm & Casualty Co. v. Singleton

Citations

  • 774 F. Supp. 2d 773
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that named defendant was a necessary party under Rule 19 where there was no actual controversy under Declaratory Judgment Act
  • dismissing a defendant that had “no contractual relationship” with the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patrick Michael Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.