· 10/28/2009
State Farm & Casualty Co. v. Singleton
Citations
- 774 F. Supp. 2d 773
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that named defendant was a necessary party under Rule 19 where there was no actual controversy under Declaratory Judgment Act
- dismissing a defendant that had “no contractual relationship” with the plaintiff
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Patrick Michael Duffy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.