Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/7/1907
State ex rel. Young v. Robinson
Citations
- 101 Minn. 277
- 112 N.W. 269
- 1907 Minn. LEXIS 557
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that although city had authority to remove delinquent city officials, the legislature did not intend to deprive the attorney general of its power to remove delinquent city officials
- “The office of Attorney General has existed from an early period, both in England and in this country, and is vested by the common law with a great variety of duties in the administration of the government.”
- “The office of Attorney General has existed from an early period, both in England and in this country, and is vested by the common law with a great variety of duties in the administration of the government.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Willis v. PottsTexas Supreme Court· 1964-04-08· cited 103×
- State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas· 1929-10-05· cited 59×
- Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationEighth Circuit· 1961-07-10· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. SchabSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-31· cited 38×
- O'Regan v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1946-11-06· cited 35×
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-07-24· cited 30×
- SER Patrick Morrisey, Attorney General v. W. Va. Ofc. of Disciplinary Counsel, etc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2014-10-15· cited 26×
- State ex rel. Ford v. YoungMontana Supreme Court· 1918-02-02· cited 25×
- Dunn v. SchmidSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-07-10· cited 21×
- State ex rel. Miller v. District CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1910-01-12· cited 21×
- State ex rel. Peacock v. Village Council of OsakisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1910-11-11· cited 17×
- Evans v. City of Redwood FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1908-02-14· cited 13×
- State v. MarketIndiana Court of Appeals· 1973-10-22· cited 12×
- State ex rel. Young v. Minnesota ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1909-01-22· cited 12×
- Markley v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1919-05-09· cited 11×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gryger v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-07-14· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Hilton v. EsslingSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-10-26· cited 6×
- State ex rel. Spannaus v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-03-06· cited 5×
- Howard v. City of St. Louis ParkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-03-12· cited 3×
- State Ex Rel. Hatch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-04-04· cited 3×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richards v. ClarksburgWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1887-11-26· cited 28×
- State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1905-11-17· cited 25×
- People v. MinerNew York Supreme Court· 1868-01-15· cited 21×
- Hunt v. Chicago & Dummy Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1886-11-08· cited 15×
- State v. OlesonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1880-06-09· cited 15×
- Greenwood v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1873-04-15· cited 14×
- Mollison v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1871-01-15· cited 7×
- City of Winona v. WhippleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1877-08-11· cited 7×
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1901-12-20· cited 4×
- People v. TweedNew York Supreme Court· 1872-09-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.