Washington Supreme Court· 1/17/1918
State ex rel. Woods v. Mackintosh
Citations
- 99 Wash. 553
- 169 P. 990
Syllabus
<p>Mandamus — To Courts — Judicial Action — Dentins Writ oe Habeas Corpus. Where an application for a writ of habeas corpus was finally denied, mandamus does not lie to compel the court to proceed to a hearing, as there was a final judgment from which appeal lies, and mandamus does not lie to control judicial action.</p>
Judges: Mount
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State ex rel. Dunham v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1919-04-16· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Luketa v. JureyWashington Supreme Court· 1919-07-31· cited 9×
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1921-11-14· cited 3×
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1928-11-22· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.