State ex rel. Wheaton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \loitering and prowling\ element of statute was satisfied where \defendant was seen behind shops of a closed plaza at 3:45 in the morning\
• holding the first element was satisfied where “defendant was seen behind shops of a closed plaza at 3:45 in the morning.”
• holding “loitering and prowling” element of statute was satisfied where “defendant was seen behind shops of a closed plaza at 3:45 in the morning”
• “[T]he loitering and prowling statute requires the officer to provide the person with the opportunity to dispel any alarm created by [the] circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).