Skip to main content
· 2/27/2025

State ex rel. West v. Hoying

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 660

Syllabus

Respondents filed no objection to the magistrate's decision. The magistrate recommended that this court issue a writ of mandamus ordering respondents to vacate the order that found West violated the conditions of his postrelease control and to enter a new order finding insufficient evidence was presented to find West violated the conditions of postrelease control. Because there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the magistrate's decision, it is adopted and the request for a writ of mandamus is granted.

Judges: Mentel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.