Skip to main content
· 12/6/1876

State ex rel. Wallace v. Hayne

Citations

  • 8 S.C. 367
  • 1876 S.C. LEXIS 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, “[p]romissory is distinct from equitable estoppel in that the representation at issue is promissory rather than a representation of fact.”
  • analyzing promissory and equitable estoppel separately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moses, Weight, Willard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.