State ex rel. Walker v. Hurlstone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the petitioner’s claims required resolution of disputed fact, they were questions of administrative discretion and required her to exhaust her administrative remedies
• holding that school district’s administrative process may have taken time, but was not futile because employee could have obtained relief sought
• noting that “outrageous conduct” contemplates “a great deal more” than simply “illegal and reprehensible conduct”
• noting that “outrageous conduct” contemplates “a great deal more” than simply “illegal and reprehensible conduct”
• noting that “outrageous conduct” contemplates “a great deal more” than simply “illegal and reprehensible conduct”
• holding that defendant’s failure to renew plaintiffs’ employment contract due to plaintiff’s non-union status may indicate “an improper motive that may support a claim for wrongful termination,” but it would not support a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).