Skip to main content
· 8/15/1857

State ex rel. Vienne v. Hyams

Citations

  • 12 La. Ann. 719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • outlining the differences between the rights warnings under Article 31(b), UCMJ, and under Miranda
  • providing a chart of differences be- tween Article 31(b), UCMJ, and Miranda warnings
  • outlining the differences between the rights warnings under Article 31 and Miranda
  • rights warning of “sexual assault” sufficient to orient accused to rape and attempted rape offenses, even involving a second victim
  • “The purpose of informing a suspect or accused of the nature of the accusation is to orient him to the transaction or incident in which he is allegedly involved.”
  • “Miranda does not require rights’ warnings as to the nature of the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buchanan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.