State ex rel. v. Stedman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not subscribe to the view that a judge is necessarily disqualified because he has formed an opinion as to the legal questions involved in the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hayes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-26· cited 19×
• State ex rel. Gerstein v. Stedman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1970-07-22· cited 11×
• Eason v. Colbath
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-12· cited 8×
• Dougherty v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-27· cited 3×
• State v. Wolfe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-06-22· cited 3×
• Aberdeen Property Owners Ass'n v. Bristol Lakes Homeowners Ass'n
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-22
• PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. v. MONICA OLIVARES, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ALBERTO OLIVARES and RANDOLPH SAPP
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-04-08
• State v. Bryant
  Palm Beach County Circuit Court· 1978-09-18

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hahn v. Frederick
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1953-07-24· cited 20×
• State ex rel. Sagonias v. Bird
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1953-10-27· cited 12×
• City of Palatka v. Frederick
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1937-06-03· cited 9×
• Dade County, Board of Public Instruction v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1964-12-09· cited 3×