State Ex Rel. Upchurch v. Blunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declaring section 116.332.1 invalid because it restricted the time in which sample initiative petitions could be submitted even though article III, section 50 and article XIII, section 2(b
• noting the legislature may “enact reasonable implementations of a constitutional directive”
• noting the legislature may “enact reasonable implementations of a constitutional directive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).