State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. Unified Gov't of Wyandotte County/Kansas City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “development of [an] auto race track facility and related projects are valid public purposes for which . . . eminent domain authority [may be] exercised”
• holding that “development of [an] auto race track facility and related projects are valid public purposes for which . . . eminent domain authority [may be] exercised”
• holding that “development of [an] auto race track facility and related projects are valid public purposes for which . . . eminent domain authority [may be] exercised”
• holding that A development of [an] auto race track facility and related projects are valid public purposes for which . . . eminent domain authority [may be] exercised @
• holding that A development of [an] auto race track facility and related projects are valid public purposes for which . . . eminent domain authority [may be] exercised @
• inclusion of auto racetrack facility in definition of “major tourism area” bears rational relationship to furtherance of economic development of the state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).