Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/1/1964
State Ex Rel. Todd v. Essling
Citations
- 268 Minn. 151
- 128 N.W.2d 307
- 1964 Minn. LEXIS 696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that last act of executive is act that “vest[s the appointee] with the powers and duties of the office”
- holding that last act of executive is act that `vest[s the appointee] with the powers and duties of the office'
- involving quo warranto proceeding challenging authority of individual claiming office as member of Board of Tax Appeals
- city council may abolish, suspend, modify, or waive parliamentary rules and courts will not ordinarily invalidate council action taken in disregard of parliamentary rule
- city council may abolish, suspend, modify, or waive parliamentary rules and courts will not ordinarily invalidate council action taken in disregard of parliamentary rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogosheske, Nelson, Sheran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Ex Rel. La Follette v. StittWisconsin Supreme Court· 1983-09-27· cited 50×
- State Ex Rel. Sanstead v. FreedNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-02-21· cited 29×
- Des Moines Register & Tribune Co. v. DwyerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-01-17· cited 25×
- In Re GovernorshipCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-12-27· cited 15×
- Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-04-02· cited 15×
- Cook v. BotelhoAlaska Supreme Court· 1996-08-02· cited 13×
- Burke v. SchmidtSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1971-10-27· cited 13×
- State of Alaska, Office of the Governor Mike Dunleavy, in an official capacity v. The Alaska Legislative Council, on behalf of the Alaska State LegislatureAlaska Supreme Court· 2021-11-12· cited 4×
- Tucker v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1999-03-26· cited 2×
- Brown v. CurbCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-12-27· cited 2×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Bay Corp.Virgin Islands· 1976-07-20· cited 2×
- KERR-McGEE NUC. CORP. v. NEW MEX. ENV. IMP.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-11-23· cited 1×
- Op. Atty. Gen. 59a-30Minnesota Attorney General Reports· 1996-07-24
- SER Danita LaDayne, Administratrix of the Estate of Jonathan S. LaDayne v. WV Legislative Claims CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2019-11-22
- In re Requests of an Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Delaware· 2025-03-07
- Dennis Walsh v. City of Orono, MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-12-31
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. GillSupreme Court· 1895-03-04· cited 143×
- Heiskell v. Mayor & City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1886-03-09· cited 49×
- Barrett v. DuffSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-07-07· cited 37×
- Baugh v. City of LaGrangeSupreme Court of Georgia· 1925-09-17· cited 33×
- State ex rel. Parker v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1875-10-07· cited 31×
- McChesney v. Sampson, GovernorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1930-01-17· cited 29×
- People ex rel. Ryder v. MiznerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1857-07-01· cited 26×
- Watkins v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1852-12-15· cited 24×
- South Georgia Power Co. v. BaumannSupreme Court of Georgia· 1929-12-16· cited 22×
- Kerr v. TregoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1864-01-26· cited 22×
- Tappy v. State ex rel. ErvinSupreme Court of Florida· 1955-07-08· cited 17×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fox v. ChaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-03-13· cited 14×
- Loper v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1900-12-20· cited 14×
- Armitage v. FisherNew York Supreme Court· 1893-12-06· cited 13×
- Mann v. City of LeMarsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1899-10-12· cited 11×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1890-06-21· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Griffith v. MatassarinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-07-07· cited 9×
- Sykes v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1913-12-19· cited 9×
- Bell v. Sampson, GovernorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1930-01-17· cited 8×
- Driscoll v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1951-12-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.