State ex rel. Tobias v. Fuerst

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 3556

Syllabus

Mandamus jail-time credit adequate remedy at law R.C.?2929.19(B)(2)(g)(iii) R.C. 2969.25(C) and cashier's statement. This court denied a mandamus action for jail-time credit because the relator had an adequate remedy at law by filing a motion for jail-time credit and an appeal of the denial of that motion. Relator is pursuing that remedy. Relator also failed to include a cashier's statement as required by R.C. 2969.25(C).