State Ex Rel. Tinsman v. Hott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that even where pattern and practice evidence is properly admissible, as in sexual harassment cases, such evidence is nonetheless subject to similarity test
• even where pattern and practice evidence is otherwise properly admissible, such evidence is nonetheless subject to the similarity test
• even where pattern and practice evidence is otherwise properly admissible, such evidence is nonetheless subject to the similarity test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).