State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Babcock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing discretionary powers of Board but concluding that “there can be no such implied powers inconsistent with any part of the constitution”
• recognizing discretionary powers of Board but concluding that \there can be no such implied powers inconsistent with any part of the constitution\
• noting, under similar Montana law, that “[t]here is no doubt that the State Board of Land Commissioners has considerable discretionary power when dealing with the disposition of an interest in land they hold in trust for the people of this state”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).