State ex rel. Thomas v. Hall
Citations
- 107 La. 764
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. The ease did not, as made to appear on the merits, come within the supervisory jurisdiction o£ this court to the extent of rendering it necessary to set aside the sentence and judgment. The affidavit or information under which defendant was prosecuted informed him of the nature of the accusation to enable him to properly defend himself against the charge brought.</p> <p>2. The statute was substantially complied with, also the ordinance of the corpo. ration the defendant was charged with having violated.</p> <p>3. The defendant was not taken by surprise and the judgment will be res judicata.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the relief sought was 17 not public injunctive relief because “any benefit to the public would be derivate of and ancillary to 18 the benefit to DoorDash’s employees”
- holding that injunctive relief sought for misclassification claims alleging violations of the California Labor Code was not a “public” injunction, as the claims had the “primary purpose and effect of redressing and preventing harm to [defendant’s] employees”
- holding that injunctive relief sought for misclassification claims alleging violations of the California Labor Code was not a “public” injunction, as the claims had the “primary purpose and effect of redressing and preventing harm to [defendant’s] employees”
- holding in labor and employment case that the claims have the primary purpose and effect of preventing harm to the defendant's employees and that any benefit to the public would be derivative and ancillary to that benefit
- finding exemption did not apply where plaintiff did “not allege that he ever crossed state lines as part of his work”
- concluding exemption did not apply to a plaintiff who did “not allege that he ever crossed state lines as part of his work. As such, there is no allegation that he engaged in interstate commerce under the definition of the narrowly-construed term.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.