State ex rel. Teague v. Edwards
Citations
- 107 La. 49
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>The statute clearly provides that no one shall be prosecuted for any fine unless the prosecution be instituted within six months of the time of incurring such fine, and does not admit of a delay within which to institute proceedings, as in case in which one is prosecuted for an offense barred by the prescription of twelve months from the time the crime is made known to an officer having authority to direct the prosecution.</p> <p>The recovery of the fine is absolutely prescribed in six months from the time the fine was iricurred and is not negatived by the averment in the information that it was filed within six months after the commission of the act was made known to an officer authorized to prosecute.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- enjoining enforcement of Georgia statute permitting rejection of absentee ballots and ballot applications due to alleged signature mismatch
- “Having created an absentee voter regime through which qualified voters can exercise their fundamental right to vote, the State must now provide absentee voters with constitutionally adequate due process protection.”
- “Having created an absentee voter regime through which qualified voters can exercise their fundamental right to vote, the State must now provide absentee voters with constitutionally adequate due process protection.”
- “Having created 25 an absentee voter regime through which qualified voters can exercise their fundamental 26 right to vote, the State must now provide absentee voters with constitutionally adequate 27 protection.”
- “[T]he Court does not understand how assuring that all eligible voters are permitted to vote undermines integrity of the election process.”
- Here, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs that the private interest at issue implicates the individual’s fundamental right to vote and is therefore entitled to substantial weight.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.