State ex rel. Tate v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was abuse of discretion for trial court to refuse to allow defendant to reclaim his right to be present upon his request to return and promise to behave
• holding that it was abuse of discretion for trial court to refuse to allow defendant to reclaim his right to be present upon his request to return and promise to behave

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).