State ex rel. Target Auto Repair v. Morales (Slip Opinion)
Citations
- 195 N.E.3d 1027
- 168 Ohio St. 3d 88
- 2022 Ohio 2062
Syllabus
Workers' compensation—Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(iv)—Employer's petition for writ of mandamus reversing the Industrial Commission's award of additional compensation to an injured worker as a result of the employer's violation of a specific safety requirement was correctly denied by the appellate court when the employer failed to file timely objections to the magistrate's decision recommending the denial of the requested writ—Motion for relief from judgment under Civ.R.60(B)—Court of appeals was stripped of jurisdiction to rule on employer's motion for relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B) once employer filed notice of appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio from the court of appeals' judgment denying the requested writ of mandamus—Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Casual employment is both irregular and brief. ‘Ordinarily, very short employments, of a few hours or days, are considered casual . . . .’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.