State ex rel. Tanner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting this change and faulting the trial court for applying the pre-amendment provision regarding the patronym
• affirming the trial court's determination that a newly acknowledged father was not entitled to have his child's surname changed to his own

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).