State Ex Rel. Symms v. City of Mountain Home

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two tracts of land separated by a roadway composed a larger parcel that allowed a severance damages award because the two tracts were used as a single unit
• interpreting a statute identical to § 12-1122(A)(2) and construing “parcel” as meaning “a consolidated body of land” that may be comprised of multiple pieces of land
• interpreting a statute identical to § 12-1122(A)(2) and construing “parcel” as meaning “a consolidated body of land” that may be comprised of multiple pieces of land
• holding a jury properly concluded that a 14-acre taking was part of a 255.44-acre larger parcel when the City owned all the land and all 255.44 acres were to be developed for recreational uses, despite a drainage ditch that left part of the property separated from the rest of the land
• holding a jury properly concluded that a 14- acre taking was part of a 255.44-acre larger parcel when the City owned all the land and all 255.44 acres were to be developed for recreational uses, despite a drainage ditch that left part of the property separated from the rest of the land
• parcel means a consolidated body of land; whether two pieces of land constitute a single parcel is a question for the jury and depends on the use and appearance of the land, its legal subdivision, and the intent of the owner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).