· 1/31/2003
State Ex Rel. Stovall v. DVM Enterprises, Inc.
Citations
- 62 P.3d 653
- 275 Kan. 243
- 49 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 782
- 2003 Kan. LEXIS 32
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming summary judgment against plaintiff because unconscionability requires “some element of deceptive bargaining conduct and unequal bargaining power” and “there [was] no evidence in the present case of unequal bargaining power”
- unconscionability requires “ ‘some element of deceptive bargaining conduct present as well as unequal bargaining power’ ”
- whether a contract contains unconscionable terms is a question of law subject to unlimited review
- any attempt to disclaim implied warranties in consumer transactions void in Kansas
- listing additional factors to consider
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.