Skip to main content
· 1/31/2003

State Ex Rel. Stovall v. DVM Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 62 P.3d 653
  • 275 Kan. 243
  • 49 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 782
  • 2003 Kan. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment against plaintiff because unconscionability requires “some element of deceptive bargaining conduct and unequal bargaining power” and “there [was] no evidence in the present case of unequal bargaining power”
  • unconscionability requires “ ‘some element of deceptive bargaining conduct present as well as unequal bargaining power’ ”
  • whether a contract contains unconscionable terms is a question of law subject to unlimited review
  • any attempt to disclaim implied warranties in consumer transactions void in Kansas
  • listing additional factors to consider

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.